Kicking off debate

It was somewhat disappointing therefore, when I and other black writers such as Cameron Duodu received such profoundly negative responses to our articles that gushed pride for what we saw as a global African family that has been on display during this World Cup. When you write an opinion piece you expect criticism and disagreement but I was shocked by what appeared to be such racially polarised views. A deluge of disdain came from what I presume were white respondents: "Black surpremist", African pride, African shame, had I forgotten about Rwanda? In sharp contrast black respondents acknowledged a global African affinity. One affectionately stated, "Even as strangers, we quietly - conspiratorially - acknowledge each other when we pass."

Watching and participating in the debate about football and identity over the last few weeks has thrown up a number of challenges for us all. The first is around the nation's discussion about what it is to be British. In a recent speech Gordon Brown sought to explore and promote a "golden thread" that binds diverse communities into a positive notion of nationhood. Brown used the literary greats such as Voltaire, Milton and Joyce to propagate the idea that fairness, justice and equality had been defining British ideals that have formed the way we are. Our generation he argued "should promote that our central beliefs are a commitment to - liberty for all, responsibility by all and fairness to all".

I strongly agree. But I would argue it's one thing stating you have a commitment and quite another implementing it. Few politicians would disagree with Brown, but who among them, including Brown, would have the passion, energy and boldness to see the project through?

The rewards for comprehensively implementing the ideals of "liberty, responsibility and fairness" would be beneficial for everyone. Extremists from all sides of the political and religious divide would be hounded out. Their politics of hate would find less favour in a society devoid of gross inequalities and mutual respect. You would also have no need for vacuous citizenship statements or flag waving exercises to prove you are a proud and loyal citizen.

In an often unjust world, pride in the nation state would come, in no small measure, from the fact that regardless of your colour, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, you are inferior to no one, not just in words but also deeds. We would wax lyrical about our queues, our Tandoori vindaloos, and our unshakable desire for a proper cup of tea. National quirks or characteristics based on a platform of shared values.

Secondly, and almost equally important is tackling this prevailing hang-up that some people have towards black communities if they should dare show any affinity and allegiance to their ancestral home. Our society should see these links and diversity as a plus not a minus.

Diversity invigorates and enhances the nation-state, particularly when it is based on a platform of social justice. Furthermore, failure to accept black communities' multi-layered identities not only inhibits us having a strong sense of British belonging, it also curtails a nation's ability to feel comfortable with its inherent differences.

One thing's for sure: this wonderful World Cup has engendered debate, discussion and passion - not only about the drama on the field of play but also off it. What are we going to talk about when it's over?