- Home
- News & Blogs
- About Us
- What We Do
- Our Communities
- Info Centre
- Press
- Contact
- Archive 2019
- 2015 Elections: 11 new BME MP’s make history
- 70th Anniversary of the Partition of India
- Black Church Manifesto Questionnaire
- Brett Bailey: Exhibit B
- Briefing Paper: Ethnic Minorities in Politics and Public Life
- Civil Rights Leader Ratna Lachman dies
- ELLE Magazine: Young, Gifted, and Black
- External Jobs
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- Gary Younge Book Sale
- George Osborne's budget increases racial disadvantage
- Goldsmiths Students' Union External Trustee
- International Commissioners condemn the appalling murder of Tyre Nichols
- Iqbal Wahhab OBE empowers Togo prisoners
- Job Vacancy: Head of Campaigns and Communications
- Media and Public Relations Officer for Jean Lambert MEP (full-time)
- Number 10 statement - race disparity unit
- Pathway to Success 2022
- Please donate £10 or more
- Rashan Charles had no Illegal Drugs
- Serena Williams: Black women should demand equal pay
- Thank you for your donation
- The Colour of Power 2021
- The Power of Poetry
- The UK election voter registration countdown begins now
- Volunteering roles at Community Alliance Lewisham (CAL)
Privilege begets privilege
Following the OBV exclusive about the lack of BME students attending Oxbridge universities, David Lammy has followed it up with his own data and analysis that paint a picture of our elite academic institutions looking rather anti-BME and anti-working class.
There are a number of critical points that his article raises, in particular that our centre of national governance - The Cabinet - it disproportionately comes from Oxbridge alumni, and/or wealthy families. What Lammy does not talk about but equally important is that it’s not just high political office that self selects from narrow pool. The Oxbridge elite is also significant and powerful in banking, the media-particularly the BBC, and in the upper elements of the Law. What we have therefore is powerful privileged elite from privileged backgrounds virtually running many of our key national institutions.
Some may say so what. Isn’t that just the way the world is? But surely a fairer society should expect to see much more talent from many more different backgrounds. This is not just a case of inequality, appalling as that may be. The other hidden penalty for which we all ultimately pay for stems from the undetected thus wasted talent that resides in abundance outside of privileged families. One challenge is that there is vested interest in maintaining the status quo.
It is right for David Lammy to point the finger at these universities, and I particularly hope that many more people use the underused vital tool of ‘Freedom of Information’ laws (FOI) to demand data from public bodies, but people will ask Lammy and his Government why they didn’t do enough to tackle these elite academic institutions when they- his Labour party - were in power.
In their defence, the Coalition Government might argue their policy that demands the high fee charging universities do more to reach out beyond their privileged recruiting grounds should make a difference, but I personally doubt it. In the short term the Government must pay those schools that predominately feed the elite universities to take bright working class and minority students in, whilst simultaneously raising the level of our other schools.
Without a long term holistic approach in all areas of our education system, we can never effectively undo the drivers that make our society so unequal.
Simon Woolley