- Home
- News & Blogs
- About Us
- What We Do
- Our Communities
- Info Centre
- Press
- Contact
- Archive 2019
- 2015 Elections: 11 new BME MP’s make history
- 70th Anniversary of the Partition of India
- Black Church Manifesto Questionnaire
- Brett Bailey: Exhibit B
- Briefing Paper: Ethnic Minorities in Politics and Public Life
- Civil Rights Leader Ratna Lachman dies
- ELLE Magazine: Young, Gifted, and Black
- External Jobs
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- Gary Younge Book Sale
- George Osborne's budget increases racial disadvantage
- Goldsmiths Students' Union External Trustee
- International Commissioners condemn the appalling murder of Tyre Nichols
- Iqbal Wahhab OBE empowers Togo prisoners
- Job Vacancy: Head of Campaigns and Communications
- Media and Public Relations Officer for Jean Lambert MEP (full-time)
- Number 10 statement - race disparity unit
- Pathway to Success 2022
- Please donate £10 or more
- Rashan Charles had no Illegal Drugs
- Serena Williams: Black women should demand equal pay
- Thank you for your donation
- The Colour of Power 2021
- The Power of Poetry
- The UK election voter registration countdown begins now
- Volunteering roles at Community Alliance Lewisham (CAL)
DNA database: Government slammed over u-turn
Campaigners furious over coalition's decision to keep innocent people's records on file.
Angry campaigners have slammed the government's u-turn on their commitment to delete the DNA of innocent people.
In a letter to a committee of MPs, Home Office Minister James Brokenshire MP, has confirmed that the DNA profiles of those arrested but not charged or convicted of any crime will be retained by the forensic science laboratories in an anonymised form. The minister has admitted that this leaves open the possibility of connecting these profile with people's names.
This decision to renege on the commitment to delete the profiles of over 1 million innocent people will have a devastating impact on the UK's African Caribbean communities, human rights campaigns group Black Mental Health UK warn.
Home office figures show that 37% of black men and 77% of young black men, aged between 15 and 34 are estimated to be on the National DNA Database, even though this group does not have higher offending rates than their white counterparts.
BMH UK point to the damage to community relations that the database has already caused, they warn that this decision will mean that the whole of the UK's African Caribbean community will be criminalised by this system.
The Home Office Minister's decision is a betrayal of the commitment he made when he spoke directly to our communities, at a BMH UK parliamentary reception, back in 2010," said Matilda MacAttram, director of Black Mental Health UK. He said if elected his party would ensure that the Scottish model would be introduced, where only those convicted a crime or arrested for a serious offence are kept on the database.
This decision not only flouts the European Court ruling on innocent DNA, it also means mean that almost every black family in the UK will continue to be criminalised by this system. This will have a devastating impact on community relations."
Olu Alake president of 100 Black Men of London, said:
This is a most disappointing betrayal by the coalition government, as it is in direct contravention of several promises made by both the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives while in opposition.
This is particularly galling for the black community as it has been statistically shown that innocent black men are particularly disproportionately overrepresented in the DNA database. We have highlighted the potential adverse impact this can have on the minds of our young people to have trust and confidence in the criminal justice system. It is imperative that the government reviews this position as a matter of urgency.
Archdeacon Daniel Kajumba chair of the Church of England's Committee for Minority Ethnic Concerns (CMEAC) added:
I am most disappointed by this decision to allow the police to continue to retain innocent DNA. It shows us that the government is not taking our concerns seriously and that we cannot take them at their word. This decision is unacceptable; I am of the view that we must make them accountable so that they take our concerns seriously as this is unacceptable.
Zohaib Rashid