- Home
- News & Blogs
- About Us
- What We Do
- Our Communities
- Info Centre
- Press
- Contact
- Archive 2019
- 2015 Elections: 11 new BME MP’s make history
- 70th Anniversary of the Partition of India
- Black Church Manifesto Questionnaire
- Brett Bailey: Exhibit B
- Briefing Paper: Ethnic Minorities in Politics and Public Life
- Civil Rights Leader Ratna Lachman dies
- ELLE Magazine: Young, Gifted, and Black
- External Jobs
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- Gary Younge Book Sale
- George Osborne's budget increases racial disadvantage
- Goldsmiths Students' Union External Trustee
- International Commissioners condemn the appalling murder of Tyre Nichols
- Iqbal Wahhab OBE empowers Togo prisoners
- Job Vacancy: Head of Campaigns and Communications
- Media and Public Relations Officer for Jean Lambert MEP (full-time)
- Number 10 statement - race disparity unit
- Pathway to Success 2022
- Please donate £10 or more
- Rashan Charles had no Illegal Drugs
- Serena Williams: Black women should demand equal pay
- Thank you for your donation
- The Colour of Power 2021
- The Power of Poetry
- The UK election voter registration countdown begins now
- Volunteering roles at Community Alliance Lewisham (CAL)
Duggan police evidence flatly contradicted
It must have been a dramatic moment at the High Court during the inquest into the death of Mark Duggan when an eye witness -only known as Miss J- gave evidence in regards to the immediate aftermath of the Mark Duggan’s shooting.
On Tuesday the officer who shot Duggan swore on oath that Duggan had taken the gun and raised his arm in a manner that would indicate he was going to fire the gun.
However, Miss J's version of events were at odds with the officer's account. She stated that she saw an officer go inside the car come out with a gun, in her words ‘as if he’d found gold’, and then put the gun in a sock.
Under cross examination she insisted she was not a ‘mad woman’, and she had no reason to lie.
The Inquest continues.
Simon Woolley