- Home
- News & Blogs
- About Us
- What We Do
- Our Communities
- Info Centre
- Press
- Contact
- Archive 2019
- 2015 Elections: 11 new BME MP’s make history
- 70th Anniversary of the Partition of India
- Black Church Manifesto Questionnaire
- Brett Bailey: Exhibit B
- Briefing Paper: Ethnic Minorities in Politics and Public Life
- Civil Rights Leader Ratna Lachman dies
- ELLE Magazine: Young, Gifted, and Black
- External Jobs
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- Gary Younge Book Sale
- George Osborne's budget increases racial disadvantage
- Goldsmiths Students' Union External Trustee
- International Commissioners condemn the appalling murder of Tyre Nichols
- Iqbal Wahhab OBE empowers Togo prisoners
- Job Vacancy: Head of Campaigns and Communications
- Media and Public Relations Officer for Jean Lambert MEP (full-time)
- Number 10 statement - race disparity unit
- Pathway to Success 2022
- Please donate £10 or more
- Rashan Charles had no Illegal Drugs
- Serena Williams: Black women should demand equal pay
- Thank you for your donation
- The Colour of Power 2021
- The Power of Poetry
- The UK election voter registration countdown begins now
- Volunteering roles at Community Alliance Lewisham (CAL)
Croydon: No support for Black 'after schools'
In a week in which the Secretary of State for Education Michael Gove stated that Black children are being marked down by their teachers, Croydon council are undermining local projects that mitigate institutional prejudice in schools and other factors that cause BME low education achievement.
Schemes which have clearly helped improve educational attainment amongst BME School students in Croydon are at risk of being abolished, undoing the progress made in turning around children’s prospects.
16 organisations across the borough have been recipients of the Education Grant Allowance, which funds extra-curricular projects designed to improve attainment for BME pupils. Close to three-quarters of the 2010/11 budget went to groups that provided Supplementary classes and mentoring.
However, the Conservative-run Council has sought to reduce the funding and the remit of the programme, cutting the funding by over 60% and focussing the scheme solely upon mentoring, ending the funding for supplementary lessons that have been so crucial to increasing educational attainment in the borough and turning Croydon around from being below the national average for educational attainment to it being above the national average.
The Council has justified its cuts by stating that the attainment improvements mean that groups no longer require council grants and that local schools can play a role in assisting BME students. Cllr Tim Pollard, Cabinet Member for Children, Families and Learning has said:
Whilst I certainly understand from our consultation that some of the groups who are losing funding may feel the impact of this decision, overall I believe that it is right for the council to invest in improving the capacity of schools to deliver these services directly, rather than relying on others to provide the extra support that these young people often need.”
The Council has failed to understand that the improvements in attainments have come as a result of supplementary learning that could only have been possible with council funding, and that there is still much more that needs to be done. Despite increasing attainment for Asian students in English and Maths at Key Stage 2, there are still fears that progress, particularly amongst Pakistani, Bangladeshi and African-Caribbean boys could stall or even be reversed by this policy and that placing the responsibility for assisting BME students in the hands of previously under performing Croydon schools will undermine the progress further.
Another worrying element to this equation is the Coalition Governments desire to scrap any equality impact assessments -PSED- for any public bodies. That means that local policy can be driven not on a needs basis or evidence based, but on political whims or, worse still prejudice.
Evidence has also shown us that investing in those areas, that ensure greater educational achievement, is ten fold cheaper than dealing with unemployment, social problems including the cost of those falling into criminal activity.
If we are to make progress, we must abandon short term, cost cutting policies that will only deliver long term problems .
Robert Austin and Simon Woolley